Quote:
Originally posted by Muffin
I do understand your point and I don't necessarily disagree. But it's about semantics and interpretation.
I don't believe it's wrong to show it either way. If one match has finished then it's full time for at least one of the matches.
There's no ambiguity because the individual matches are quite clear.
When people have different viewpoints on things like this, someone will tend to mention real-life scenarios.
Imagine on your favourite football program when they have the pundits on and they show the current scores. At the top of the screen they tend to title it "Latest Scores" or something along those lines and the they will list the current score lines. Once they list "Full Time Results" they only list the matches where the final whistle has blown, as and when these results come in.
The referee doesn't blow the whistle in one match and suddenly the program shows "Full Time Results" and list all matches regardless under this banner.
It's not a massive issue as I have only just noticed it, but when I see "Full Time" over a list of results, I would assume that the final whistle has blown in all of these matches. Yes, it does show the correct match status at the side of each match, but the overall status and the individual status seems to clash. Also, if I see some matches are showing "2nd half" while the title shows "Full Time", I don't know what time is on the clock for the remaining matches.